Species
Clear Selection
Dairy
Beef
Poultry
Swine
Equine
Challenges
Clear Selection
Animal Performance
Antibiotic Free Production
Broiler Carcass Quality
Digital Dermatitis
Gut Health
Heat Stress
Inflammation
Lameness
Reproduction/Gestation
Respiratory
Transition Cow Management
Zinpro Value
Water Quality
This website uses cookies to provide necessary site functionality and to improve your online experience. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy.
X
< Return to Articles
3 minute read

Understanding the Hidden Losses from High Sow Replacement Rates

Sow nursing piglets in a crate
Mr. Hans Aae

Business Development Manager, Swine, International Sales Division
Zinpro Corporation

Finding the right sow replacement balance is key for the production efficiency of a swine operation. Current sow replacement rates in Europe range from 35 to 55 percent, while replacement rates in the United States are around 45 percent. This means many swine production operations are experiencing hidden financial losses due to early sow replacement.

But it’s a delicate balance to ensure productivity and sow reproduction metrics are met, while managing costs.

Not replacing the right number of sows will result in too many older sows in the herd, and this can limit genetic improvement. On the other hand, replacing too many sows in the herd can create impaired immunity, lower productivity and an even higher replacement rate as gilts introduced to the herd may not be structurally sound to provide multiple parities.

These losses, when added up, can reduce income opportunities for a pork producer.

How Much Are High Replacement Rates Costing Your Operation?

graphic showing net cost of raising a gilt

The direct cost of raising a gilt, including breeding, vaccination, rearing, etc. is 550€ ($627) USD. Of this cost, 150€ ($171 USD) can be recovered if and when that replacement sow is sent to slaughter, leaving us with a net cost of 400€ ($456 USD) for raising a replacement gilt.

Graphic showing lost earnings for replacing too many sows per year

On a 1,000-head sow farm, this comes out to around 40,000€ ($45,000 USD) in lost earning opportunities due to replacing 10 percent more sows than necessary.

Graphic showing lower value for progeny from first-parity sows

One study has shown that you can sell up to three additional slaughter pigs from an older sow than from a first-parity sow. With a gross margin of 50€ ($57 USD) per slaughter pig, the value of progeny from first-parity sows is up to 150€ ($171 USD) less than from an older sow.

Graphic showing less value of litters from first-parity sows.

Progeny of first-parity sows also experience slower growth and can weigh 4.5 kg (9.9 pounds) less at slaughter, which can reduce their value by 7,50€ ($8.50 USD) per pig. This can add up to a reduced litter value of up to 100€ ($113 USD) for a first-parity sow weaning 12 to 14 piglets.

Graphic showing total reduced value from replacing too many sows.

Adding the reduced value of 150€ ($171 USD) for the progeny of first-parity sows and the reduced value of up to 100€ ($113 USD) per first-parity sow due to lower progeny weight at slaughter reveals a cost of about 250€ ($285 USD) per first parity sow. On a 1,000-head sow farm, the cost of replacing 10 percent too many sows is around 25,000€ ($28,500 USD) per year.

Graphic showing lost earnings from replacing too many sows.

When adding the hidden losses from reduced production performance from first-parity sows and the cost of raising a replacement gilt, the total cost of replacing 10 percent too many sows on a 1,000-head sow farm is up to 65€ ($74) per sow, or a 65,000€ ($74,000 USD) reduction in income per year.

Most producers don’t realize these costs, because the impacts are hidden. Fortunately, producers can take a proactive approach to discover the extent of their hidden losses. That process starts by answering these questions:

  • What is your replacement rate per year?
  • What is the average parity number?
  • What percent of gilts introduced will have a minimum of 3 parities?
  • How many good culls and how many bad culls are made on your farm?
  • What is the reason for your sow replacement?

Small changes can make a huge difference in overall income. A hidden loss of 65€ ($74 USD) per sow per year is a considerable amount of money and worth corrective steps to turn this hidden loss into profit.

Research has shown that feeding performance trace minerals, such as the zinc, manganese and copper found in Availa®Sow, to gilts and sows positively impacts sow reproduction performance and improves herd longevity, as well as better performance from the progeny.

Learn more about the hidden costs of early sow replacement by reading The Hidden Losses Associated with Sow Replacement white paper. Contact your Zinpro representative today to discuss how to increase income opportunities on your farm by improving sow replacement rates.

Improving Swine Reproductive Efficiency — Seasonal Infertility and Heat Stress

Eighty-six percent of sows are culled due to reproductive failures — it’s the number one reason producers cull sows.  But what are the underlying factors for these reproductive issues? Learn how seasonal infertility and heat stress may be the culprit to your herd reproductive failures.

Read more >
Improve Swine Reproduction and Piglet Performance with Availa®Sow + Availa®Cr

The principle components of sow productivity are litter size and non-productive days. Learn how performance trace minerals from Availa®Sow and Availa®Cr improve swine reproduction by producing heavier litters and reducing the number of non-productive days when supplemented in gestation and lactation sow and gilt diets.

Read more >
Detect Lameness in Cows Early and Improve Dairy Cow Reproduction Performance

Lameness can have a significant impact on dairy cattle reproductive performance. Detecting lameness early can help improve dairy cow reproduction and reduce the risk of culling. Learn about the many benefits of early lameness detection and find out how performance trace minerals play a part in managing lameness.

Read more >